martes, 22 de enero de 2013

WE, THE PEOPLE...

 For our journey is not complete until our wives, our mothers and daughters can earn a living equal to their efforts...



CNN Politics

Vice President Biden, Mr. Chief Justice, members of the United States Congress, distinguished guests, and fellow citizens: 

Each time we gather to inaugurate a President we bear witness to the enduring strength of our Constitution. We affirm the promise of our democracy. We recall that what binds this nation together is not the colors of our skin or the tenets of our faith or the origins of our names. What makes us exceptional - what makes us American - is our allegiance to an idea articulated in a declaration made more than two centuries ago:

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” 

Today we continue a never-ending journey to bridge the meaning of those words with the realities of our time. For history tells us that while these truths may be self-evident, they’ve never been self-executing; that while freedom is a gift from God, it must be secured by His people here on Earth.  The patriots of 1776 did not fight to replace the tyranny of a king with the privileges of a few or the rule of a mob. They gave to us a republic, a government of, and by, and for the people, entrusting each generation to keep safe our founding creed. 

And for more than two hundred years, we have. 

Through blood drawn by lash and blood drawn by sword, we learned that no union founded on the principles of liberty and equality could survive half-slave and half-free. We made ourselves anew, and vowed to move forward together. 

Together, we determined that a modern economy requires railroads and highways to speed travel and commerce, schools and colleges to train our workers. 

Together, we discovered that a free market only thrives when there are rules to ensure competition and fair play. 

Together, we resolved that a great nation must care for the vulnerable, and protect its people from life’s worst hazards and misfortune. 

Through it all, we have never relinquished our skepticism of central authority, nor have we succumbed to the fiction that all society’s ills can be cured through government alone. Our celebration of initiative and enterprise, our insistence on hard work and personal responsibility, these are constants in our character.

But we have always understood that when times change, so must we; that fidelity to our founding principles requires new responses to new challenges; that preserving our individual freedoms ultimately requires collective action. For the American people can no more meet the demands of today’s world by acting alone than American soldiers could have met the forces of fascism or communism with muskets and militias. No single person can train all the math and science teachers we’ll need to equip our children for the future, or build the roads and networks and research labs that will bring new jobs and businesses to our shores. Now, more than ever, we must do these things together, as one nation and one people.

This generation of Americans has been tested by crises that steeled our resolve and proved our resilience. A decade of war is now ending. An economic recovery has begun.  America’s possibilities are limitless, for we possess all the qualities that this world without boundaries demands: youth and drive; diversity and openness; an endless capacity for risk and a gift for reinvention. My fellow Americans, we are made for this moment, and we will seize it - so long as we seize it together.

For we, the people, understand that our country cannot succeed when a shrinking few do very well and a growing many barely make it.  We believe that America’s prosperity must rest upon the broad shoulders of a rising middle class. We know that America thrives when every person can find independence and pride in their work; when the wages of honest labor liberate families from the brink of hardship. We are true to our creed when a little girl born into the bleakest poverty knows that she has the same chance to succeed as anybody else, because she is an American; she is free, and she is equal, not just in the eyes of God but also in our own.

We understand that outworn programs are inadequate to the needs of our time. So we must harness new ideas and technology to remake our government, revamp our tax code, reform our schools, and empower our citizens with the skills they need to work harder, learn more, reach higher. But while the means will change, our purpose endures: a nation that rewards the effort and determination of every single American. That is what this moment requires. That is what will give real meaning to our creed. 

We, the people, still believe that every citizen deserves a basic measure of security and dignity. We must make the hard choices to reduce the cost of health care and the size of our deficit. But we reject the belief that America must choose between caring for the generation that built this country and investing in the generation that will build its future.  For we remember the lessons of our past, when twilight years were spent in poverty and parents of a child with a disability had nowhere to turn. 

We do not believe that in this country freedom is reserved for the lucky, or happiness for the few. We recognize that no matter how responsibly we live our lives, any one of us at any time may face a job loss, or a sudden illness, or a home swept away in a terrible storm. The commitments we make to each other through Medicare and Medicaid and Social Security, these things do not sap our initiative, they strengthen us. They do not make us a nation of takers; they free us to take the risks that make this country great.

We, the people, still believe that our obligations as Americans are not just to ourselves, but to all posterity. We will respond to the threat of climate change, knowing that the failure to do so would betray our children and future generations.  Some may still deny the overwhelming judgment of science, but none can avoid the devastating impact of raging fires and crippling drought and more powerful storms. 

The path towards sustainable energy sources will be long and sometimes difficult. But America cannot resist this transition, we must lead it. We cannot cede to other nations the technology that will power new jobs and new industries, we must claim its promise. That’s how we will maintain our economic vitality and our national treasure - our forests and waterways, our crop lands and snow-capped peaks. That is how we will preserve our planet, commanded to our care by God. That’s what will lend meaning to the creed our fathers once declared.

We, the people, still believe that enduring security and lasting peace do not require perpetual war.  Our brave men and women in uniform, tempered by the flames of battle, are unmatched in skill and courage.  Our citizens, seared by the memory of those we have lost, know too well the price that is paid for liberty. The knowledge of their sacrifice will keep us forever vigilant against those who would do us harm. But we are also heirs to those who won the peace and not just the war; who turned sworn enemies into the surest of friends - and we must carry those lessons into this time as well.

We will defend our people and uphold our values through strength of arms and rule of law. We will show the courage to try and resolve our differences with other nations peacefully –- not because we are naïve about the dangers we face, but because engagement can more durably lift suspicion and fear.

America will remain the anchor of strong alliances in every corner of the globe. And we will renew those institutions that extend our capacity to manage crisis abroad, for no one has a greater stake in a peaceful world than its most powerful nation. We will support democracy from Asia to Africa, from the Americas to the Middle East, because our interests and our conscience compel us to act on behalf of those who long for freedom. And we must be a source of hope to the poor, the sick, the marginalized, the victims of prejudice –- not out of mere charity, but because peace in our time requires the constant advance of those principles that our common creed describes: tolerance and opportunity, human dignity and justice. 

We, the people, declare today that the most evident of truths –- that all of us are created equal –- is the star that guides us still; just as it guided our forebears through Seneca Falls, and Selma, and Stonewall; just as it guided all those men and women, sung and unsung, who left footprints along this great Mall, to hear a preacher say that we cannot walk alone; to hear a King proclaim that our individual freedom is inextricably bound to the freedom of every soul on Earth.

It is now our generation’s task to carry on what those pioneers began. For our journey is not complete until our wives, our mothers and daughters can earn a living equal to their efforts. Our journey is not complete until our gay brothers and sisters are treated like anyone else under the law –- - for if we are truly created equal, then surely the love we commit to one another must be equal as well.  Our journey is not complete until no citizen is forced to wait for hours to exercise the right to vote.  Our journey is not complete until we find a better way to welcome the striving, hopeful immigrants who still see America as a land of opportunity  - until bright young students and engineers are enlisted in our workforce rather than expelled from our country.  Our journey is not complete until all our children, from the streets of Detroit to the hills of Appalachia, to the quiet lanes of Newtown, know that they are cared for and cherished and always safe from harm. 

That is our generation’s task - to make these words, these rights, these values of life and liberty and the pursuit of happiness real for every American. Being true to our founding documents does not require us to agree on every contour of life. It does not mean we all define liberty in exactly the same way or follow the same precise path to happiness. Progress does not compel us to settle centuries-long debates about the role of government for all time, but it does require us to act in our time. 

For now decisions are upon us and we cannot afford delay. We cannot mistake absolutism for principle, or substitute spectacle for politics, or treat name-calling as reasoned debate.  We must act, knowing that our work will be imperfect. We must act, knowing that today’s victories will be only partial and that it will be up to those who stand here in four years and 40 years and 400 years hence to advance the timeless spirit once conferred to us in a spare Philadelphia hall. 

My fellow Americans, the oath I have sworn before you today, like the one recited by others who serve in this Capitol, was an oath to God and country, not party or faction. And we must faithfully execute that pledge during the duration of our service. But the words I spoke today are not so different from the oath that is taken each time a soldier signs up for duty or an immigrant realizes her dream. My oath is not so different from the pledge we all make to the flag that waves above and that fills our hearts with pride. 

They are the words of citizens and they represent our greatest hope. You and I, as citizens, have the power to set this country’s course. You and I, as citizens, have the obligation to shape the debates of our time - not only with the votes we cast, but with the voices we lift in defense of our most ancient values and enduring ideals.

Let us, each of us, now embrace with solemn duty and awesome joy what is our lasting birthright. With common effort and common purpose, with passion and dedication, let us answer the call of history and carry into an uncertain future that precious light of freedom. 

Thank you. God bless you, and may He forever bless these United States of America.

jueves, 17 de enero de 2013

LA LIBERTAD


“Hoy he borrado el número de mi casa
y el nombre de la calle donde vivo.
He cambiado la dirección de todos los caminos.
Si queréis encontrarme ahora
llamad a cualquier puerta de cualquier calle
en cualquier ciudad en cualquier parte del mundo.
Esta maldición, esta bendición:
dondequiera que encontréis la libertad, allí tengo mi morada.”

Amrita Pritam (1919-2005)

miércoles, 16 de enero de 2013

MUJERES ETERNAMENTE MENORES DE EDAD

En un mundo globalizado, lo que le ocurre a las mujeres de Irán me ocurre a mi...

 

Iranian single women might need father's permission to go abroad

Parliamentary bill proposes requirement for single women to obtain official consent from their guardian to leave country

An Iranian woman shows writing on her hands saying women should have the same rights as men. Photograph: Abedin Taherkenareh/EPA      

Single women in Iran will need the permission of their guardians to be able to leave the country if a new bill secures enough votes in parliament.

At the moment, unmarried women and men above the age of 18 can leave the country if they have a passport but, according to the new bill, single women would need official consent from their guardian, usually their father.

Married women in Iran always need their husband's permission to be able to hold a passport both under the current legislation that dates back to the pre-1979 Islamic revolution and under the proposed bill.

Husbands can ban their wives from leaving the country at any time. Divorced women, however, are currently free to hold a passport and leave the country without permission.

"Anyone above the age of 18 can apply for a passport," Hossein Naghavi-Hosseini, the speaker of the parliamentary committee on national security and foreign policy told the semi-official Isna news agency. "According to this bill … married women of any age need the written consent of their husband to be able to have a passport and single women above the age of 18 will need the permission of their guardian." Single women whose guardian denies them permission could dispute the decision in a court.

Since the 1979 Islamic revolution, women's rights campaigners have struggled to abolish the need for the husband's consent but the new bill, if passed, would be a major setback.

Shadi Sadr, a prominent women's rights activist and human rights lawyer, told the Guardian: "The mentality behind these controversial laws is that women should have owners, to give power to men to have control over women." The majority of people inside Iran who were barred from leaving the country were either women who did not have the permission of their husbands or tax evaders, she added.

Mohammad Mostafaei, a well-known Iranian lawyer currently living in exile in the Netherlands, called the need for permission "the modern slavery". In an article published on the opposition website Rahesabz he writes: "Only slaves at the time of slavery needed permission to go here or there."

Barring citizens from leaving the country is one of the ways the Islamic republic has punished many of its critics in recent years. In a recent example, the family members of the jailed award-winning lawyer, Nasrin Sotoudeh, including her 12-year-old daughter, were subjected to a travel ban.




lunes, 7 de enero de 2013

If this is your Life, then this is your car...Si esta es tu vida...





The Motherhood feat. Fiat 500L

  

Sin duda esta es la vida de muchas mujeres de hoy, lo que no tengo tan claro es que este sea nuestro coche...

Los publicistas lo hacen muy bien: analizan y capturan con claridad y realidad, las escenas cotidianas de nuestras vidas para plasmarlas en sus anuncios, a veces con la intención de crear ilusión "de ser" si utilizamos ese producto; y otras veces, para lanzarnos a la cara que o compras ese producto o a cada amanecer nos derrumbaremos al ver la puta realidad, gracias Mónica Naranjo....

¡Bendita publicidad!, ¡benditos anuncios, que reflejan las miserias de lo que somos y la grandeza de lo que querríamos ser!!


How the Fiat ad captures the essence of modern motherhood

 

Right now, the Fiat 500L mum is right for us. She may not have it all but she does it all and that's become a badge of honour

You don't get much less aspirational than the harassed mum character in the Fiat 500L advert. Stepping over the tide of kiddie-trash that sweeps over any family carpet, she raps out a readily identifiable tale – one based on extensive focus group interviews with mothers. Her "babes" are her two children, her "bitches" are her dogs, and her "hoes"‚ well, it's just a hose. She's got the episiotomy scar and the yoghurt-smeared laptop. Her life is a war of attrition against domestic havoc, and her only escape is a book club, which she joined just so she could drink wine. There are only a few shots of the car, and no information at all about what it does, but the message is obvious: if this is your life, then this is your car.

And presumably plenty of people see their life in the video, given that it's clocked up over 2m views on YouTube. In one respect, this assault of the familiar represents an escape of sorts from the relentlessly bloody upscale tone of the average car ad‚ whimsical youngsters scampering about town to a sickly-twee indie pop soundtrack, or the achingly clever brand-building of the Honda ads. Screw "the power of dreams": the Fiat ad is very much aimed at someone who'd appreciate the power of eight hours' sleep uninterrupted by a child who needs a wee/a glass of water/reassurance that the Lightning McQueen poster on their wall hasn't come to life and started giving them funny looks.

But in another way, it's a version of the self-defeating humblebrag that can give motherhood its special nightmarish quality. Being impregnated doesn't have to be the first stage in a complicated, decades-long process of martyrdom, but plenty of people take it that way anyway. Torn perineums, cracked nipples and black bags under your eyes aren't just the acceptable price of generating new life: they become the marks of your commitment to maternity. The playground plaints about how busy you are aren't necessarily designed to inspire pity or aid, so much as a deep and awestruck admiration in your listener for just how much you do. Because the more hectically overworked your are, the logic goes, the better a mother you must be.

Dads don't seem to have the same impulse for competitive misery. In fact, fathers often get a version of the glass escalator, whereby their simple maleness elevates minor parental actions to achievements of heroic wonder. Things like doing the school run, making the packed lunches or washing the school shirts – the kind of entry-level parenting without which your children would be naked, hungry and not even at school – can win coos of applause and admiring remarks about how good it is that he "helps". If you're a mum who does this stuff with grinding regularity and no public applause, then this might well piss you off. The chaps have every right to feel mightily insulted too: if providing basic care for their children gets them petted like a dog walking on its hind legs, just how low must our paternal expectations be?

But ads aren't pitched to the utopian future society we might become‚ a future where women don't embrace a packhorse destiny and a man is allowed to change a nappy without someone organising a chorus line to do a high-kicking routine in praise of his masculine virtue. Ads are designed to sell to us as we are now, with all our flaws and susceptibilities and right now, the Fiat 500L mum is right for us: in her photogenically haggard way, there's something aspirational to her after all. She might not have it all, but she does it all, and that's a badge of honour. As the chorus goes, "You're in the motherhood/And you're in for good." But if no one wanted to be in the motherhood, no one would buy the car that shows the world you belong there. Fiat knows that telling other people we're doing too much is what mums really do best.

viernes, 4 de enero de 2013

NO PUEDE SER, AQUÍ FALTAN DATOS...




Custodia compartida para un padre condenado por violencia de género



Una juez de Dénia ha concedido la guarda y custodia compartida de un niño a su padre, a pesar de que este había sido condenado “por un delito de lesiones leves en el ámbito de la violencia de género” a la madre, según recoge la sentencia de divorcio del matrimonio, publicada hace dos semanas. La madre, María Nieves G., había solicitado la guarda y custodia para sí, con un régimen de visitas para el padre limitado a fines de semana alternos y un día entre semana. La titular del Juzgado de Violencia sobre la Mujer número 1 de Dénia aceptó, en cambio, en línea con el fiscal, la petición del padre, Juan Bautista F. Y lo motivó señalando que no estaba acreditado que existiera riesgo para el menor ni para la cónyuge —la madre no alegó tal cosa en el procedimiento, ni al ser preguntada por la juez, señala el fallo—, y que durante el régimen de visitas establecido transitoriamente hasta que hubiese sentencia, no se produjo ningún “incidente” que reflejase peligro.

La juez consideró que, en tal contexto, debía prevalecer “la protección del interés del menor”, concretada en mantener la relación con ambos progenitores. La magistrada recuerda en el fallo que la ley veta de forma general la guarda conjunta cuando uno de los cónyuges “esté incurso en un proceso penal iniciado por atentar contra la vida, la integridad física, la libertad, la integridad moral o la libertad e indemnidad sexual del otro cónyuge o de los hijos que convivan con ambos”. Y también, cuando de las alegaciones de las partes y las pruebas practicadas el juez advierta “indicios fundados de violencia doméstica”. La juez constata que, en este caso, no es que el padre estuviese incurso en un procedimiento penal “sino que ha sido condenado por un delito relacionado con la violencia de género”. Pero se acoge a una excepción contemplada en el mismo Código Civil, que permite obviar las prevenciones anteriores y decretar la guarda compartida “fundamentándola en que solo de esta forma se protege adecuadamente el interés superior del menor”.

La magistrada —que indica en la resolución que la condena por lesiones leves fue dictada por su propio juzgado— cita sentencias del Supremo para concluir que no basta con que un progenitor esté incurso en un procedimiento relacionado con la violencia de género (o condenado), sino que dicha conducta penalmente perseguible debe “comportar un riesgo para los hijos o para el otro” cónyuge. De lo contrario, sigue, “el castigo al progenitor derivaría en un perjuicio para los hijos, que se verían privados de una relación normalizada con uno de sus progenitores sin causa objetiva para ello”.
La sentencia menciona que hay otros dos procedimientos en marcha entre los cónyuges. Una acusación de faltas contra el padre por haber publicado en Facebook el informe forense que se emitió durante el juicio por lesiones leves —“informe en el que se hace constar que se aprecia una lesión en la zona de la sien y ojo derecho que, tras la limpieza con agua, se constata que es maquillaje o colorete que no lleva en el lado contrario”, señala la juez—. Y otro procedimiento contra la madre, impulsado por el padre, por supuesta denuncia falsa por intentar, presuntamente, "incrementar los moratones mediante el uso de maquillaje".